UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF THREE STATISTICAL METHODS

Authors

  • Raphael Abrahão Universidade Federal da Paraíba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59627/cbens.2014.2180

Keywords:

Climate Data, Cluster Analysis, Trend Analysis, Precipitation

Abstract

This study assesses the use of historical climate data as well as traditional and non-traditional statistical methods to understand climate change at a regional level. Three different approaches were considered: i) general evaluation of climate data evolution, including comparison between two periods (early and late years); ii) trend analysis; and iii) cluster analysis. Daily data of rainfall and snowfall were obtained from the Sudbury Airport weather station (Canada) from January 1956 to December 2010 (55 full years). The comparison between periods revealed that annual rainfall is increasing in the studied location, being 12% higher in recent years. Trend analysis and cluster analysis showed that these increasing annual trends were not uniform throughout the year, occurring mainly in winter and spring. On the other hand, decreases in summer rainfall were detected by cluster analysis only. According to cluster analysis results, summers are becoming drier in the location, although overall, years are becoming wetter. Regarding snowfall, there was no difference between the two periods compared and trend analysis detected no significant trends. However, cluster analysis showed clear changes during the main months of snowfall (December, January and February), indicating that climate in the location is changing towards late winters regarding snowfall. Thus, the results demonstrate that inclusion of simple methods such as cluster analysis, combined with more traditional statistical methods, can contribute to a better understanding of climate change.

Downloads

Author Biography

Raphael Abrahão, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

Departamento de Engenharia de Energias Renováveis

References

Alexander, L. V., Zhang, X., Peterson, T. C., Caesar, J., Gleason, B., Klein, A. M. G., et al., 2006. Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 111, D05109, pp. 1-22.

Davidson, E. A., de Araújo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Balch, J. K., Brown, I. F., Bustamante, M. C., et al., 2012. The Amazon basin in transition, Nature, vol. 481, n. 7381, pp. 321–328.

Disch, J., Kay, P., Mortsch, L., 2012. A resiliency assessment of Ontario’s low-water response mechanism: implications for addressing management of low-water under potential future climate change, Canadian Water Resources Journal, vol. 37, n. 2, pp. 105-123.

Durack, P. J., Wijffels, S. E., Matear, R. J., 2012. Ocean salinities reveal strong global water cycle intensification during 1950 to 2000, Science, vol. 336, n. 6080, pp. 455-458.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., Black, W., 1998. Multivariate data analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, and New York.

Kendall, M. G., 1975. Rank correlation methods, Griffin, London, UK.

Knapp, A. K., Fay, P. A., Blair, J. M., Collins, S. L., Smith, M. D., Carlisle, J. D., et al., 2002. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland, Science, vol. 298, n. 5601, pp. 2202-2205.

Magnuson, J. J., Webster, K. E., Assel, R. A., Bowser, C. J., Dillon, P. J., Eaton, J. G., et al., 1997. Potential effects of climate changes on aquatic systems: Laurentian Great lakes and Precambrian shield region, Hydrological Processes, vol. 11, n. 8, pp. 825-871.

Malhi, Y., Aragao, L. E., Galbraith, D., Huntingford, C., Fisher, R., Zelazowski, P., et al., 2009. Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, n. 49, pp. 20610–20615.

Mann, H. B., 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend, Econometrica, vol. 13, pp. 245-259.

OCCIAR, Ontario Centre for Climate Impacts and Adaptation Resources, 2010. Climate Change and Conservation Authorities in Northern Ontario, Workshop Report. OCCIAR, Sudbury.

Sen, P. K., 1968. Estimates of the regression coefficient ased on kendall’s tau, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 63, pp. 1379-1389.

Vincent, L. A., Gullett, D. W., 1999. Canadian historical and homogeneous temperature datasets for climate change analyses, International Journal of Climatology, vol. 19, n. 1, pp. 1375–1388.

Wang, B., Ding, Q., 2006. Changes in global monsoon precipitation over the past 56 years, Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 33, L06711, pp. 1-4.

Published

2014-04-13

How to Cite

Abrahão, R. (2014). UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF THREE STATISTICAL METHODS. Anais Congresso Brasileiro De Energia Solar - CBENS. https://doi.org/10.59627/cbens.2014.2180

Issue

Section

Anais